![]() Following the initiation of Safe Harbor, the laying date on Safe Harbor properties advanced 16.1 days over a 19-yr period, compared with 11.6 days on control properties. ![]() This could have been due to more Safe Harbor properties (87%) than control properties (68%) receiving artificial cavities that offset cavity losses. Following the initiation of Safe Harbor, the probability of territory abandonment on control properties increased by ∼14% over a 19-yr period, while it remained constant on Safe Harbor properties. Between 19, we monitored 55 RCW territories (30 Safe Harbor, 25 control). ![]() Here, we evaluate the effects of Safe Harbor on RCWs in the North Carolina Sandhills. Despite the relevance for conservation, the benefits of Safe Harbor remain largely unknown. Landowners enrolled in the Safe Harbor select management actions to enhance habitat for existing populations, but incur no additional responsibilities for increases in populations. The inaugural program targeted endangered Red-cockaded Woodpeckers ( Picoides borealis hereafter, ‘RCW') in the North Carolina Sandhills, USA. In 1995, the Safe Harbor program (hereafter, ‘Safe Harbor’) was initiated to alleviate concerns of private landowners about conservation of imperiled species. Land use restrictions imposed by the Endangered Species Act may create conflict, affecting conservation on private lands. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |